Planet GNOME is a good read lately. After Canonical found it to be a great idea to take 75% of revenue away from GNOME Foundation for an application Canonical didn’t even develop, discussions about older experiences of Canonical’s “interaction” with the GNOME community.
It basically goes on like this: Mark Shuttleworth blames GNOME for allegedly being close-minded for not adopting app indicators and GNOME people are arguing that the rejection was solely based on bad timing (feature freeze too close) and disagreement about the implementation on a purely technological level.
Whatever the truth is (read the posts and decide yourself), the aspect I find most amusing is the irony that Shuttleworth on one hand portrays himself as a victim of GNOME’s alleged high entry barrier for contributions and on the other hand requires contributors to Canonical projects (incl. the indicator library) to assign all copyrights to Canonical and rejects patches because Ubuntu is not a democracy and all design decisions are made solely by Canonical.
Either Shuttleworth is a great comedian or he really does not get the disconnection between his acts and what he preaches.