My Little Blog

August 23, 2010

Bye Firefox, hello Rekonq

Filed under: Uncategorized — kmi @ 14:30

I’ve been following the development of Rekonq since quite some time. With the release of 0.6beta I finally made the switch from Firefox.

While FF is nicely extensible, it got more and more on my nerves with its slow JavaScript execution, bad KDE Workspace integration (even with SUSE’s KDE extension for FF), etc.

Getting FF’s bookmarks into Rekonq took some manual steps, but overall went smooth:

  1. Export FF’s bookmarks with its bookmark manager as HTML file.
  2. Close Rekonq/Konqueror, run keditbookmarks and import the HTML file.
  3. Let keditbookmarks fetch all favicons (select all and then right-click).
  4. Define your FF bookmark bar folder als KDE bookmark bar folder.
  5. Close keditbookmarks and launch Rekonq again.

A few glitches came up pretty soon: All text fields were off, weird crashes on Facebook, and no spell check in text fields.
The first two glitches have already been fixed in Qt. So I added openSUSE’s pre-release Qt 4.7 repo and upgraded all Qt components. So far I don’t see any problems despite its pre-release status (it even fixed the flickering with apps using dbus-menu in the systray).

Spell check is indeed missing but luckily after Qt 4.7 the QtWebKit team will release new QtWebKit versions independently from Qt. So getting spell check after WK Bug 42100 has been fixed, we don’t need to wait all the time for a new Qt release.

Currently Rekonq has no extension support. It’s in development, though, and AdBlock support is built-in anyway (not that I care about a Web Inspector but that one is built-in as well).

A small but irritating quirk is the too high bookmark bar in Rekonq. Favicons are 16βœ•16 pixels but Rekonq stretches them. I circumvented the problem by manually defining higher resolution icons in keditbookmarks. Now my bookmark bar looks very pretty with those high-res icons. πŸ™‚

Yeah, I listed a few quirks but considering the big picture and how much FF sucks (performance-wise) these days, the benefits outweigh the quirks. Maybe if Mozilla Corp. reconsiders and officially releases a Firefox 4 variant built on the Qt port which Nokia has done for MeeGo Handset and follows the KDE HIGs (eg. no "Preferences" in the "Edit" menu), I may switch back. But since that scenario is unlikely, I stay with Rekonq for the foreseeable future.


  1. You can compile yourself firefox-pgo with cairo-qt backend if you want. Just put cairo-qt instead of cairo-gtk in the mozconfig.

    The thing that makes me upset is that no packagers *#@#@*$ care about packaging firefox-qt for their distros, and people switch away from firefox. But the problem is even worse. Ask suse why do they continue of making a hybrid kde4 desktop instead of a pure kde/qt one. Last time i tried opensuse with kde i still saw libgnome* and gnome* packages dragged into it. Then people cry that kde is slow. Of course it is. Firefox and chromium are the best (imo) browsers out there and guess what, they both use gtk2. So you end up having gtk2 and some gnome libs in memory while running a kde desktop with kdelibs and qt already in memory. So bye bye 180 megs in ram. That means swap and slowness. Try firefox with gtk2 in a bare minimalist(awesome wm, wmii, *box, whatever..) desktop. It doesn’t feel slow any more.

    My 2c, admiral0

    Comment by admiral0 — August 23, 2010 @ 15:30

    • SUSE’s Firefox extension does not work against a Qt build. The extension would still be required to support Plasma notifications, KDE Open/Save windows, etc.

      The problem with Firefox’ Qt built is that almost everyone thinks it’s a dead project. Up until Nokia announced that a special Qt Fennec build will be used in MeeGo Handset, I thought that it’s dead as well.
      Someone (maybe you if you already do it) should provide Qt-based FF builds for Linux – possibly using Build Service to target almost all distos – and blog about it in a way that it appears on Planet KDE and Planet Mozilla.

      Comment by Markus — August 23, 2010 @ 15:55

      • I use Archlinux, and i use a optimised (pgo & -O3) build of firefox 4.

        I’ll retry to build cairo-qt. (Last time i had some linking trouble with cairo)

        Comment by admiral0 — August 23, 2010 @ 18:02

  2. I have to say that also gave up firefox, I’m using konqueror with webkit, much faster than with khtml and fully compatible with pages I web access, I believe that as this case we are using the same engine web, problems and issues of velocity are equal, but as konqueror is already a project with a lot more time on the road, I’ll be with himself.

    Comment by Emerson — August 23, 2010 @ 15:59

  3. I switched to XFCE desktop’s webkit based Midori web browser, really nice, fast, and even java runtime works with it. too bad none kde/qt based webkit browsers are anywhere near midori… feature wise !

    Really, rekonq, arora, kwebkit part seems ‘immature’ compared to midori web browser!

    Comment by fast_rizwaan — August 23, 2010 @ 16:03

    • can you please be more precise? Where exactly do you see immaturity? By knowing our weaknesses we may be able to fix them πŸ˜›
      Thanks! πŸ™‚

      Comment by pano — August 23, 2010 @ 19:03

      • 1.’s game won’t load in qtwebkit (qt 4.6.3, rekonq 0.5.0) with 4.7beta2+0.5.80, it works. (perhaps javascript bug in qt 4.6.3)

        2. favorites behavior is strange in rekonq, add a favorite, then open a webite, and then add this page to favorite… when added it closes the opened page! rekonq in file association, but there’s no option.
        8. let user choose download manager, why only kget, midori allows other download managers…

        9. java is not dead! many banks, stock analysis sites, (, uses Java applets to display information. A good browser should not dump old technologies which are required by users, just because jre is becoming passe.

        anyways, rekonq is superb, please just add netscape plugins, and add favorite behavior, that will make it the best! good luck πŸ™‚

        Comment by fast_rizwaan — August 23, 2010 @ 22:33

      • Half of your complains ( and Java) are about QtWebKit and are nothing the Rekonq team can do about.
        According to Java support has been added.

        Comment by Markus — August 24, 2010 @ 09:03

  4. There is really just one feature missing that is preventing me from using rekonq: open links from external sites in a new tab. I am just too dependent on this from firefox.

    Comment by TheBlackCat — August 23, 2010 @ 16:37

    • What do you mean by “external sites”? Did you mean other applications? Rekonq does that.

      Comment by Markus — August 23, 2010 @ 16:46

      • No, I mean that when you are on a website, and you click a link for a different website (different domain), it opens that in a new tab instead of the current tab.

        Comment by TheBlackCat — August 23, 2010 @ 16:57

      • I just middle-click to oben links in a new tab. I already had this habit in FF.

        Comment by Markus — August 23, 2010 @ 17:41

      • Middle clicking isn’t the same. I really like this behavior in firefox and I can’t switch over to rekonq until it is implemented.

        Comment by TheBlackCat — August 23, 2010 @ 19:06

      • Sure you can. You just don’t want to. (Which is OK.)

        Comment by Markus — August 24, 2010 @ 09:04


      Comment by pano — August 23, 2010 @ 19:32

      • Thanks, but I’m the one who submitted that bug report.

        Comment by TheBlackCat — August 23, 2010 @ 20:45

    • dude, don’t be lazy, if you don’t want to middle-click on the link, then right-click on the link and choose open in new tab πŸ™‚

      anyways, your wish is really nice. a smart webbrowser would know whehter to open a link in new tab or in the current tab based on domain name. same domain = same tab; different domain name = new tab. nice!

      it is a firefox extension, no!? perhaps chromium extension have this feature also!?

      Comment by fast_rizwaan — August 24, 2010 @ 09:17

  5. Β« and follows the KDE HIGs (eg. no “Preferences” in the “Edit” menu), Β»

    So, you blame firefox for that and you switch to a browser that doesn’t even offer a menubar ? πŸ™‚

    Comment by Christophe — August 23, 2010 @ 16:45

    • My gripe is less about the menu bar and more about where the menu is located.
      In Firefox the entry is located on the left side of the window (“Edit” is the second after “File”).
      In Rekonq 0.6 I can move the menu button wherever I want. In my case it’s in the right side of the address bar while the bookmarks menu button is left of the address bar – much closer to the KDE HIG compared to FF.
      Upcoming Rekonq version will probably have an optional menu bar again because that will be the requirement to integrate well with Plasma Netbook’s global (Mac-like) menu bar.

      Comment by Markus — August 23, 2010 @ 16:53

    • Well, at least it has a standard customizable tool bar now, so there is hope πŸ™‚

      But I don’t understand why people say WebKit is fast. Just try my page and compare scrolling speed. KHTML is so much faster.

      Comment by christoph — August 23, 2010 @ 16:59

      • I don’t really notice any difference. Maybe Qt 4.6’s WebKit is slower on your site. To me both engines seem even.

        Comment by Markus — August 23, 2010 @ 17:38

  6. Any idea why keditbookmarks, launched throught Rekonq, doesn’t allow import/export bookmarks ?

    Comment by Lionel Chauvin — August 23, 2010 @ 17:02

    • No idea but as long as it works I don’t care much.

      Comment by Markus — August 23, 2010 @ 17:39

    • Just noticed that you are right πŸ˜€
      we really should investigate this πŸ˜‰

      Comment by pano — August 24, 2010 @ 12:44

  7. Yes, Rekonq is shaping up nicely. It does have its quirks, though. And the one that’s holding me back is its inability to behave properly on systems with 2 or more virtual desktops. When I hit a URL from an external app, I want it to be processed in the Rekonq window open on that very desktop, or to open a new one if none exists – just like Konqueror does. Rekonq, instead, is just a mess at that, and opens pages on desktops that have nothing to do with the desktop hosting that link. I’ll adopt it immediately when this is fixed.

    Comment by Iwanna go backtotheblueroom — August 23, 2010 @ 17:20

  8. The big pro of FF was and still are the extensions, but now Chrome and more recently Safari are supporting extensions too.
    I wish that rekonq would support the JS Chrome extensions or /and the new Firefox JetPack extensions.
    And keditbookmarks should have support for tags for the bookmarks.

    FF with a new profile is not so slow after all, but with the time it gets slower. In Windows it is Fast! Of course they give more priority to Window version.

    I don’t like to use a marginal browser, but sometimes I has to be used, the same with our marginal OS based on a UNIX-like OS.

    In October the RC of FF 4 will be released, and in Nov. the Final Version.

    Opera 10.6x I also not so bad.

    If Chromium would support tags in bookmarks, and the bug #39496 would be fixed…

    Comment by Astreek — August 23, 2010 @ 18:04

    • there actually is some development effort going into supporting Chrome extenstions. See this branch:

      Comment by pano — August 23, 2010 @ 18:57

    • Support for Chrome extensions in Rekonq is already in development. Hopefully it’ll be finished in a few months. But isn’t FF’s most useful extension AdBlock? That is already a built-in feature of Rekonq as well as Konqueror.
      Rekonq itself is just a minor browser but its rendering engine is not. So far I have yet to encounter a website that does not work with it. OTOH pages like make FF crawl.
      Ever since Safari 1.0 was released, the Mozilla people promised that in the next FF version the performance gap will be closed but it seems to me that the gap is increasing.
      In the early Safari days FF had the benefit that many websites did not work with Safari but today website authors are aware that there are FF, Safari, Chrome, various other WebKit browsers for smartphones, and even relative standards compliant versions of IE.

      Comment by Markus — August 23, 2010 @ 19:09

      • AdBlock and the Better Popup Blocker are the two major plugins for me.

        Comment by Andre — August 24, 2010 @ 15:42

      • The AdBlock+ extension is the most important for me, but there are thousands of extensions for both, FF and Chrome(ium), and I use like ~15.
        Extensions is the most useful feature of FF, and the one the make it popular (also that there was almost only Internet Explorer..)

        Good to see progress in Rekonq extensions!

        Comment by Astreek — August 24, 2010 @ 18:17

  9. Did you get “List Links with Kget” to work? It doesn’t seem to do anything for me.

    Comment by TheBlackCat — August 23, 2010 @ 19:05

    • works nicely here… What exactly does not work?

      Comment by pano — August 23, 2010 @ 19:11

      • It doesn’t do anything at all. I click the menu entry and nothing seems to happen. I’m not even entirely sure what I am supposed to be seeing.

        Comment by TheBlackCat — August 23, 2010 @ 20:44

  10. I vastly prefer either reKonq or Konqueror using WebKit as well. Firefox makes me feel like I’m using a different computer with its non-integration and weak performance. Right now I use Chrome though, because I generally don’t know how to get the latest versions of things, and it works well. (Stuck with 0.4.x now.) I would still prefer native looking windows though, and I absolutely swoon at the thought of using native window-bar tabbing rather than Google-Look. Still Google-Look is better than wasting screen space on a separate tab-only bar.

    Very looking forward to reKonq 0.6 release version packaged officially for my distro.

    Comment by Jerzy Bischoff — August 23, 2010 @ 21:14

    • Which distro are you using?
      For anything KDE-related I strongly suggest openSUSE.

      Comment by Markus — August 23, 2010 @ 21:37

  11. I. LOVE. Rekonq.

    I love that it opens fast.
    I love the way it looks (minimalist UI)
    I love the way it handles webpages.
    I love the way it handles history and closed tabs.
    Flash and heavy java (eg WordPress content editor) often feel a bit sluggish. (I am running trunk, which may be part of this)
    I love the integration with KDE (downloads / notifications).

    Great work team Rekonq!

    Comment by Kubuntiac — August 23, 2010 @ 22:33

  12. Well, rekonq has few issues … especially for http sites that redirect you to https pages (for example, as a secure login). Right now, it redirects me to when that happens πŸ™‚

    Maybe this is an issue with KDE itself but issue nonetheless.

    Comment by KenP — August 24, 2010 @ 00:09

    • Doesn’t happen here. Maybe a Qt 4.6 bug that has been fixed in 4.7?

      Comment by Markus — August 24, 2010 @ 09:07

      • Well, I am running Qt 4.7 on Fedora 13 and yet this ‘bug’ persists. My company’s home page has a login link which never loads in rekonq.

        Comment by KenP — August 25, 2010 @ 01:20

      • For the record, I am unable to login to a site like After entereing my email id and password, I am thrown back to

        Is this an issue with KDE itself?

        Comment by KenP — August 25, 2010 @ 01:25

      • Seems like the same issue as
        I have no clue what’s causing that bug for you and the reporter. All I can say is that it doesn’t happen for me and I’d guess for the developers neither because then they’d be annoyed by it and fixed (or at least commented on) that. Here’s my exact setup:

        Rekonq 0.5.80 (=0.6beta) + KDE SC 4.5.0 + Qt 4.7nightly as shipped in openSUSE’s Build Service (newer than the beta2 release).

        Maybe it isn’t even a software problem. Maybe it’s a connection problem to your DNS provider, caused by overload on his side or possible overload for your modem.
        When I have many connections established (by running a P2P service or whatever) my DSL modem is not able to handle the load all the time, causing occasional lockups.
        You could try to reduce the number of concurrent connections in your P2P program (if you have one running) and maybe tweak the network connection timeout settings in System Settings.

        Comment by Markus — August 25, 2010 @ 07:49

  13. If only QtWebKit and KHTML would start supporting HTML5 video tag properly, so that there would be less flash nuisance since youtube and vimeo have both pretty nice HTML5 players… Codecs are issue especially with vimeo but one problem at the time πŸ™‚

    Comment by bliblibli — August 24, 2010 @ 11:32

    • QtWebKit supports the video tag. Most distributions just disable it.

      Comment by Markus — August 24, 2010 @ 13:20

  14. ok, just test opera 10.61, it’s a nice browser. firefox 4 seems to be following opera 10.6x interface.

    opera = qt + everything (full features) – opensource; which is a lot better than chromium or other non qt/kde browsers.

    hat’s off to opera browser 10.6x

    Comment by fast_rizwaan — September 3, 2010 @ 10:08

    • Opera doesn’t use Qt. It abandoned Qt a few releases ago.

      Comment by Markus — September 4, 2010 @ 13:28

  15. Big fan of Rekonq (made me return to KDE πŸ™‚ ). I reported a bug and received immediate answer. I wish Ubuntu could be faster putting new versions in official repositories. Now 0.5 version in KDE 4.4.2, only glitch is an error in facebook pages regarding javascript (it displays a message saying that a script is causing an error and if I with to stop it). Other than that: fast, clean, well supported browser. Not using FF anymore (philosophical issues about branding and GPL, lack of integration with both Gnome [look and feel of some gtk themes] and KDE). Liked Epiphany and Midori but missed some features. Havn’t tried Konqueror with other engine. Will follow Rekonq and see what happens.

    Comment by Marcelo Escobal — September 4, 2010 @ 11:00

    • Update to Qt 4.7 and the Facebook JavaScript error goes away.

      Comment by Markus — September 4, 2010 @ 13:29

    • Check out the two ppa’s by yoann-laissus. One for stable releases, and one near daily development snapshots. Very cool. πŸ™‚

      Comment by Kubuntiac — September 4, 2010 @ 21:28

  16. I’ve just given Rekonq a test drive for a couple of days now. But things I miss, from the top of my head, is Auto Copy, better tab management and session restore. The last one I found out the hard way… 😦

    Comment by dexter — October 19, 2010 @ 22:06

    • Current rekonq *has* session restore. When you restart it, it pops up with a bar at the top (like the “Do you want to remember the password” bar) Saying that Rekonq appeared to have crashed and would you like to restore the session. I don’t know if it can handle multiple windows like FireFox, but I have to say it’s message looks much more aesthetically pleasing.

      Comment by Kubuntiac — October 19, 2010 @ 22:26

      • Hmm… I’m running rekonq 0.6.1 on Kubuntu 10.10 (KDE 4.5.1) and I have never seen that…

        Comment by dexter — October 20, 2010 @ 14:45

      • I tried killing rekonq and starting it frΓ₯n the meny. The session was remeberd. But if I shut down my computer with rekonq open and then starts the computer again, Kubuntu starts the programs that was open on shutdown. But the rekonq session is lost…

        Comment by dexter — October 20, 2010 @ 15:05

      • @ Dexter – Just add deb maverick main to your sources. It gives you the latest stable release (which right now is 6.50 ). I’m also running Kubuntu 10.10 πŸ™‚

        Comment by Kubuntiac — October 21, 2010 @ 00:25

  17. thanks for the tip on how to import the bookmarks.

    pretty useful.

    Comment by thanks — December 1, 2010 @ 14:29

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Blog at

%d bloggers like this: